Moreover, through quantitative and qualitative research techniques, a great evaluation will help to identify what aspects of a policy, programme or initiative have worked well (and reasons why) and what aspects could be improved upon or enhanced. Identifying the features of success and issues for improvement at strategic and delivery levels, can then help shape future policy making and lay the foundations for follow-on initiatives that can deliver improved positive impact for communities and businesses.
I have particular expertise in evaluating projects designed to help people into work, business support and growth schemes and community and neighbourhood regeneration. To date, I have evaluated over 60 projects and programmes for clients such as Universities, Local Authorities, Local Enterprise Partnerships, Skills and Employability Partnerships, Neighbourhood Regeneration Partnerships and Non Profit organisations. My scope of evaluation has included community-based projects of circa £1M, through to sub-regional programmes up to £50M and national programmes. Projects have typically been funded by the UK Government (City Deal, Local Growth Fund, Education Skills Funding Agency, and various neighbourhood regeneration funding programmes), The National Lottery Community Fund, European Union’s Regional Development Fund and Social Fund, Local Government, the Coalfields Regeneration Trust and others.
Some evaluation assignments have been delivered in two phases: a mid-point or interim evaluation combined with an end of programme evaluation; some have been longitudinal providing clients with a formative and summative evaluation; and others have been commissioned as an end of programme evaluation. The most beneficial approaches are when clients seek to learn and improve as they go along their implementation journey. Most programmes have involved several organisations working as a partnership and by assessing what aspects are working well at early or interim stage, I can highlight areas for improvement so that clients can adjust accordingly and maximise the impact of their efforts in the remaining lifetime of their programme. Interim evaluation work can also supplement programme monitoring by reviewing the extent to which a programme is on track to deliver its targets and meets its objectives.
My approach to evaluation assignments is to adopt a mixed methodology tailored to the needs of the client and the scope of the study. This will include quantitative and qualitative research techniques. A review of the “facts and figures” will tell us an important part of the story but some of the most insightful aspects of evaluation come from digging deeper – by gathering first-hand feedback from project beneficiaries, delivery staff and those at strategic and management levels.